Lies for salvation in an attempt to prove that the client is a mammoth or how Tinkoff is lying to both the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and the court

I received objections from Tinkoff in court and, to put it mildly, I was shocked by the stupidity and blatant lies of Tinkoff

This is what the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Tinkoff writes:

and the same Tinkoff writes the following to the court:

Several points immediately catch your eye

1. The Central Bank of the Russian Federation Tinkoff says that consent was given on November 3, 2023 when entering the Mobile application and provides screenshots of the mobile application, and the same Tinkoff tells the court that consent was given on the website and provides screenshots of the Internet bank)))) It turns out that Tinkoff cannot decide where Was consent given? or Tinkoff is just lying like he breathes

2. In addition, in the Tinkoff universe, I allegedly on the same day (that is, 11/03/2023) asked by email to withdraw my consent, while the consent was revoked in the Tinkoff universe for some reason not on 11/03/2023 but on 02/02/2024)))))

Schrödinger’s consent and withdrawal of consent are some kind)))

I’ll leave the rest of the Tinkoff review for now for trial and publish them later

Question gentlemen IT people.

In what universe is a top 10 largest bank unable to distinguish between logging into an Internet browser and logging into a mobile application? ))) Despite the fact that all inputs are logged from IP and cookies to the type of operating system, number and name of the browser or mobile application.

My conclusion is simple. Tinkoff simply lied in an attempt to prove the existence of consent to the processing of Biometrics, which I, of course, did not give