We analyzed the whole situation with electric agendas in more detail here, so I won’t repeat myself, it’s better to read the main longread:
The most detailed analysis of the law on electronic subpoenas through public services. How to deregister military records remotely
The new law on electronic subpoenas potentially applies to almost all Russian men from 18 …
www.habr.com
ChatGPT disappointed economist
Steve Landsberg, a professor at the University of Rochester, set ChatGPT on his trademark exam in economics, and the neural network is nothing I could not decide.
True, in the comments to the professor wrotethat if the prompt to GPT-4 includes the words “imagine that you are Steve Landsberg – a damn smart professor of economics!”, then she begins to answer much better. =)
Elon Musk has now decided to personally lead the cyber apocalypse
Last month, Elon Musk lamented the risks of too rapid development of artificial intelligence, sprinkled ashes on his head, and signed all sorts of letters demanding a pause in further AI research.
And last week It revealedthat in the meantime he was actively hiring developers and buying graphics accelerators in order to file his own large language model.
It would also be nice to remember that Musk was kicked out of OpenAI in 2018, when he tried to take power into his own hands and become the sole ruler of the sea [зачеркнуто] the chief neurosetologist – and all other researchers who directly sawed AI with their hands did not like this alignment.
Hype on the topic of neural networks brings money
How is it guaranteed to attract investors’ money? You just need to name your startup CryptoGPT – and you will immediately will issue million ten bucks!
If it seems to you that the name lacks one more abbreviation, then the creators have provided for this:
The company also planned to issue a series of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that would store data on the activity of the owner.
Wangyu, that if they shoved this word right into the name and called it “CryptoGPT-NFT”, they could raise 100 million dollars at once, not 10!
FTX Resurrection News Arrives Just Before Easter
For the last six months, the FTX crypto-exchange managers who have been managing the bankruptcy process have been telling us scary stories almost every few weeks about how badly the curly-haired Cryptosem managed this very exchange: the accounting was not really kept there, and the expenses were approved by emoticons in the chat, and what only indecent was not yet did.
And all of a sudden, last week, one of the bankruptcy lawyers came out and said “You know, we are thinking here, or maybe restart this crypto exchange of yours? everything was fine, the babosiks were spinning, the profit was muddied!” Quotes of the FTT token instantly doubled.
You can sit down for bitcoin billions even after 10 years
In 2012, a guy named James Zhong discovered that if you quickly click the “withdraw funds” button in the underground crypto black market Silk Road several times, you can withdraw more Bitcoins than you actually have in your account. So James quickly called to himself about 50 thousand Bitcoins (about $600k then).
By 2021, the cost of these cue balls has already grown to $ 3.4 billion – and Mr. Zhong himself could already cut circles in a sparkling Lamborghini around his mansion on the lake.
True, since all transactions with Bitcoin are stored on the blockchain forever, American law enforcement officers eventually still caught our hero. And even the fact that our Robin Hood stole from other criminals (the authors of Silk Road are also in places not so remote for a long time), alas, did not save him much.
Russian court refused to recover USDT
The guys from GMT Legal shared a cool story about how one Russian gave another a certain amount of USDT stablecoins as a loan. And he decided not to give it away!
The unsuccessful lender went to the Russian court to demand that justice be restored, and that decided that’s what:
Xs in general, where did you get the idea that these cryptofantas of yours are worth something. Here in your contract it is not written anywhere that 1 USDT = 1 dollar, which means that the cost cannot be reliably determined.
It is also impossible to establish who owns which crypto wallet (after all, no stock exchange has carried out a compliance procedure for identifying a client there), so it is difficult to somehow qualify movements between these wallets.
In short, the court decided that nothing should be returned to anyone. Such is cryptoanarchy. By the way, does anyone want to lend me a thousand or two USDT?
If the selection of news seemed interesting to you, I will be grateful for subscribing to my TG channel RationalAnswerwhere I try to find smart approaches to personal finance and investment.