choose one of several good ideas

6.6. Usefulness – 4. May be a unique solution if it works.

13. Wiki resource for expert systems

13.1. It is necessary to implement:

· A full-fledged forum with registration and the ability to supplement and improve the ES, as well as roll back changes and add new ES.

Find some experts and start filling out

Advertising and drawing attention

13.2. How to make money on it?

Advertising on the website. Donations.

13.3. Competition

Advantages

The answer to your question without having to dig into the topic.

There is less information than in Wikipedia, which means that there is an opportunity to better control it.

disadvantages

Time to accelerate, the need for control.

13.4. Habr’s opinion – 4/10

13.5. Budget – 2k to support the site.

13.6. Usefulness – 5. Can help a lot of people without any fuss with production and shopping.

18. Quantum Robo Cactus

18.1. It is necessary to implement:

Correction of form factor and positioning

Develop a working prototype

Modify the case and collect test samples

Server part

· Submit for crowdfunding.

18.2. How to make money on it.

Sell the resulting items

18.3. Competition

Advantages

A unique feeling of closeness and care

disadvantages

Taking it seriously requires a conscious effort.

There are similar designs with a greater degree of intimacy (vibrating rings that transmit heartbeats).

18.4. Habr’s opinion 10/10

18.5. The budget is at least 5k per prototype.

18.6. Usefulness – 5. Solves an urgent problem.

19. Program for printing dialogues

19.1. It is necessary to implement:

· Site with editor

Crowdfunding

19.2. How to make money on it:

Sell slicing of your correspondence files in pdf. Or ready-made books.

19.3. Competition

Advantages

An unusual way to preserve memories

disadvantages

For an amateur

19.4. Habr’s opinion – 2/10

19.5. 2k budget for site support. 6k for print tests.

19.6. Usefulness – 2. Few romantic clients could just screen dialogs.

21. Social network for posthumous published notes.

21.1. It is necessary to implement:

· A full-fledged forum.

· A verification system to make sure the person is dead.

21.2. How to make money on it:

Advertising, registration fees.

21.3. Competition

Advantages

Lack of direct analogs

disadvantages

Lack of thought. How to identify specific people, but avoid fiddling with documents?

21.4. Habr’s opinion – 5/10

21.5. Budget – 5k to support the site.

21.6. Usefulness – 3. Replaceable service, but there is something in it. Can be a unique opportunity in both communication and artistic sense.

32. Rack for the blind with “talking” cells

32.1. It is necessary to implement

Normal project on arduino

32.2. How to make money on it?

Well, grandma can give me a mower for this thing. Or there you can sell to old people from the society of the blind.

32.3. Competition.

Advantages

Lack of direct analogs

disadvantages

It can be expensive.

32.4. Habr’s opinion – 9/10

32.5. Budget – 4k for components.

32.6. Usefulness – 4. Solves an important but very narrow problem.

36. Predictor Simulator

36.1. It is necessary to implement

Simple application

Make beautiful

36.2. How to make money on it?

Make the application paid. DLC?

36.3. Competition.

· Advantages

Lack of direct analogs

· Disadvantages

It can be expensive.

36.4. Habr’s opinion – 1/10

36.5. The budget is 2k for placing the prototype in the playmarket.

36.6. Usefulness – 1. ~~He gives people who believe fortune-tellers what they want, and money for me.~~ Absolutely useless

54. Anti-theft beacon

54.1. It is necessary to implement:

· Elaboration of the form factor.

· Board design.

· Program

54.2. How to make money on it?

Sell to concerned parents, travelers, and others.

54.3. Competition.

Advantages

Ability to call rescuers in an unforeseen way.

disadvantages

The event is too rare to be protected from it in this way, only if not everyone buys beacons – then the abducted will simply be searched more thoroughly.

There are watches with such capabilities.

You can take the most common car beacon.

You can take the phone (although it will be the first to take it away)

None of this will help if someone needs to be bribed.

54.4. Habr’s opinion – 4/10

54.5. 3k budget per prototype.

54.6. Usefulness – 5. Solves a very urgent problem. In theory.

99. Universal siren.

99.1. It is necessary to implement.

Think over the form

Board design

· Program

Modify the case

· Submit for crowdfunding.

Avoid captcha

99.2. How to make money on it?

Selling to weird guys like me.

99.3. Competition

Advantages

Flexible configuration so that any change can be checked.

disadvantages

All the same can be done using the application on the phone.

99.4. Habr’s opinion – 3/10

99.5. Budget – 1.5k per prototype.

99.6. Usefulness – 2. Allows you to track something. But do you need it?

Estimate in numbers

After I examined each project from all sides, I realized that the budget is an item that can be abolished, since it rarely exceeds several thousand, unless you count the costs of crowdfunding (we consider it optional).

I estimated all the characteristics very roughly, as the sum of their sub-items.

Sub-items highlighted in bold in the difficulty section give two points instead of one.

In the perspective section, ideas that are not supposed to be physically produced received a plus one point. For the rest, I judged them subjectively.

The advantages section is simply disadvantage points minus merit points. I have aligned them so that all values are non-negative.

As an opinion of the habr, I took the results of voting for the best ideas from the end of the previous article. I took the values relative to the maximum and expressed them in a ten-point system (except that I shifted the values close to the maximum, so that only the best idea would have 10 points.

Usefulness is the expected benefit from the project, if it is launched, assessed by me on a five-point scale.
I got the following table as a result:

	Complexity	Perspectives	Advantages	Opinion	Benefit
1. Personality recognition by gestures read by EMG	5	1	2	nine	2
6. Assistance in mastering movements using EMG	7	4	1	6	4
13. Wiki resource for expert systems	3	5	1	4	5
18. Quantum Robo Cactus	5	3	-1	ten	5
19. Program for printing dialogues	3	5	0	2	2
21. Social network with delayed publication.	2	3	0	5	3
32. Rack for the blind with speaking cells	1	2	0	nine	4
36. Predictor Simulator	2	5	0	1	1
54. Anti-theft beacon	4	3	-4	4	5
99. Universal siren.	5	2	0	3	2

Pursuit	min	max	max	max	max
Price	1	2	1	1	1

I decided that the prospects of the project should be assessed twice in relation to the rest of the scales. If this raises questions for you, then I, it seems, have only been doing for a month now that I have come up with a gag. This is not the first time.

I decided to simplify the table as much as possible so that my small program responds equally to each sign. To do this, I expanded the difficulty scale by subtracting each element from 10. Thus, the difficulty of 4 for the beacon turned into an ease of 6.
I multiplied the entire second column by two, so as not to do it separately.

I added 4 to each element in the third column to make each element in the table non-negative.
I have no idea if this makes any sense. However, the table now looks like this:
benefit

	Ease	Perspectives	Advantages	Opinion	Benefit
1. Personality recognition by gestures read by EMG	5	2	6	nine	2
6. Assistance in mastering movements using EMG	3	eight	5	6	4
13. Wiki resource for expert systems	7	ten	5	4	5
18. Quantum Robo Cactus	5	6	3	ten	5
19. Program for printing dialogues	7	ten	4	2	2
21. Social network with delayed publication.	eight	6	4	5	3
32. Rack for the blind with speaking cells	nine	4	4	nine	4
36. Predictor Simulator	eight	ten	4	1	1
54. Anti-theft beacon	6	6	0	4	5
99. Universal siren.	5	4	4	3	2

Now all characteristics tend to the maximum and are equally evaluated.

I am going to select the best options according to the method Electra II… It consists in pairwise comparison of options according to several criteria. We multiply the difference between the two characteristics by its price and add to P (hypothesis for) or N (hypothesis against). If one of the ideas has a clear advantage, then we note that it is better.

For example, let’s compare ideas 1 and 6:

For the first: P_1.6= 2 + 0 + 1 + 3 + 0 = 6

Against the first: N_1.6= 0 + 6 + 0 + 0 + 2 = 8

D_1.6= P_1.6/ N_1.6= 3/4 <1, then the first idea is worse than the sixth. C_1.6= 4/3

Let’s repeat this operation for every possible pair. We reflect the resulting connections on the graph (By the way, an excellent service, thanks):

Something too many connections, nothing to keep track of. Then we leave only those connections for which C> 1.3:

Here! This is much clearer. I want to note that elements 54 and 99 flow into absolutely everything else, so it makes no sense even to consider them – they are the weaker of all. So I ruled them out. It is lucky that there are no loops in the graph, otherwise the coefficients would have to be adjusted.

In accordance with the resulting graph, on the first tier there are 19, 13 and 36

On the second – 1 and 32.

On the third – 6.

On the fourth – 21.

Solemn results

The winner of our small championship “Decide what you want” is a social network with postponed publication (idea 21). Now, according to my idea, it is connected not only with wills. Let anyone be able to post an encrypted message, which will become public when following a certain link, which can be done, for example, by a relative who finds a strange QR code in the desk drawer of a suddenly missing person. There are many details to be thought about, but this idea seems to me quite interesting, promising and with not particularly difficult implementation.

If idea 21 does not suit the manager or encounters unexpected difficulties, then I will try to implement a complex project related to the reading of gestures by EMG sensors.

Otherwise I’ll just make those talking shelves for the blind. I’m going to collect them anyway as a course project on another subject.

Just a summary

Thank you so much for taking part in this exciting adventure with me. I had a wonderful month and it was very funny. I am absolutely confident in my topic of the diploma (although it came as a kind of surprise), and if not, then I have a ready-made list of how to replace it.

Although these three articles do not have much academic value (apart from the very lateral use of TPR), even though I have not done much research, this is clearly a new word in self-digging, showing off and meticulousness. I’m sure no one has done anything like this before me. I might even order a T-shirt with one of these pixelated squares. I almost did not rely on facts, it was more a kind of Bayesian withdrawal. Only without any connection with the theorem. And in general, I did not find out about him from there, at all… In short, I used the process of gathering information to choose the best options myself, being familiar with all the important details. It could not have been otherwise, given that I myself evaluated all the coefficients. It is no coincidence that only beautiful ideas that I liked were in the top ten.

My search for an idea for a diploma is over, and this is very cool. I’m glad I wrote these thirty pages. It is even possible that my experience will help someone make the right decision – not necessarily for mathematical reasons. Thank you all for your comments and votes, I once again ask you to report on any project that already has some of my ideas, especially ten from this article. It is important for me to know that I have created something unique.

Goodbye. See you when I learn something well enough to teach it, well, or come up with something really funny.